+1 for the release. We have plenty of fixes in and users have already
asked for a new release.

-Max


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Hi Aljoscha,
>
> OK for me, you can go ahead ;)
>
> Thanks again to tackle this release !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 10/21/2016 08:51 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>>
>> +1 @JB
>>
>> We should definitely keep that in mind for the next releases. I think this
>> one is now sufficiently announced so I'll get started on the process.
>> (Which will take me a while since I have to do all the initial setup.)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 at 06:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> No problem, MQTT and other IOs will be in the next release..
>>>
>>> IMHO, it would be great to have:
>>> 1. A release reminder couple of days before a release. Just to ask
>>> everyone if there's no objection (something like this:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/80de75df0115940ca402132338b221e5dd5f669fd1bf915cd95e15c3@%3Cdev.karaf.apache.org%3E
>>> )
>>> 2. A roughly release schedule on the website (something like this:
>>> http://karaf.apache.org/download.html#container-schedule for instance).
>>>
>>> Just my $0.01 ;)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/20/2016 06:30 PM, Dan Halperin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>
>>>> This is a great discussion to have! IMO, there's no special
>>>> functionality
>>>> requirements for these pre-TLP releases. It's more important to make
>>>> sure
>>>> we keep the process going. (I think we should start the release as soon
>>>
>>> as
>>>>
>>>> possible, because it's been 2 months since the last one.)
>>>>
>>>> If we hold a release a week for MQTT, we'll hold it another week for
>>>> some
>>>> other new feature, and then hold it again for some other new feature.
>>>>
>>>> Can you make a strong argument for why MQTT in particular should be
>>>
>>> release
>>>>
>>>> blocking?
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Aljosha !!
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you mind to wait the week end or Monday to start the release ? I
>>>
>>> would
>>>>>
>>>>> like to include MqttIO if possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> ⁣
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 20, 2016, 18:07, at 18:07, Dan Halperin
>>>
>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> thanks for taking the time and writing this extensive doc!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If no-one is against this I would like to be the release manager for
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> next (0.3.0-incubating) release. I would work with the guide and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> update it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with anything that I learn along the way. Should I open a new thread
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this or is it ok of nobody objects here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spinning this out as a separate thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 -- Sounds great to me!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> thanks for taking the time and writing this extensive doc!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If no-one is against this I would like to be the release manager for
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> next (0.3.0-incubating) release. I would work with the guide and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> update it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with anything that I learn along the way. Should I open a new thread
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this or is it ok of nobody objects here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 07:10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> well done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As already discussed, it looks good to me ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/20/2016 01:24 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>>>> As a project, I think we should have a Release Guide to document
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> process, have consistent releases, on-board additional release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> managers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and generally share knowledge. It is also one of the project
>>>>>>
>>>>>> graduation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> guidelines.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dan and I wrote a draft version, documenting the process we did
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> first two releases. It is currently in a pull request [1]. I'd
>>>>>>
>>>>>> invite
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> everyone interested to take a peek and comment, either on the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pull
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> itself or here on mailing list, as appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Davor
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/49
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to