It could make sense. However we should keep it informative. I mean that distinct could appear confusing for some users compare to AvoidDuplicate or whatever.
Regards JB On Oct 24, 2016, 18:46, at 18:46, Jesse Anderson <je...@smokinghand.com> wrote: >My original thought for this change was that Crunch uses the class name >Distinct. SQL also uses the keyword distinct. > >Maybe the rule should be changed to adjectives or verbs depending on >the >context. > >Using a verb to describe this class really doesn't connote what the >class >does as succinctly as the adjective. > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:40 AM Neelesh Salian <nsal...@cloudera.com> >wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> First of all, thank you to Daniel, Robert and Jesse for their review >on >> this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-239 >> >> A point that came up was using verbs explicitly for Transforms. >> Here is the PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/1164 >> >> Posting it to help understand if we have a consensus for it and if >yes, we >> could perhaps document it for future changes. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- >> Neelesh Srinivas Salian >> Engineer >>
