+1

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Agree
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> ⁣​
>
> On Oct 25, 2016, 12:01, at 12:01, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >+1 This sounds quite straightforward.
> >
> >On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 01:36 Thomas Groh <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hey everyone,
> >>
> >> I've been working on a declaration of intent for how we want to use
> >> PipelineOptions and an API change to be consistent with that intent.
> >This
> >> is generally part of the move to the Runner API, specifically the
> >desire to
> >> be able to reuse Pipelines and the ability to choose runner at the
> >time of
> >> the call to run.
> >>
> >> The high-level summary is I wan to remove the
> >Pipeline.getPipelineOptions
> >> method.
> >>
> >> I believe this will be compatible with other in-flight proposals,
> >> especially Dynamic PipelineOptions, but would love to see what
> >everyone
> >> else thinks. The document is available at the link below.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wr05cYdqnCfrLLqSk-
> -XmGMGgDwwNwWZaFbxLKvPqEQ/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >>
>

Reply via email to