+1 (non-binding) Thank you for putting this together
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > No problem for the vote. > > For graduation, we are already thinking about it yes. > > Regards > JB > > > > On Oct 27, 2016, 08:54, at 08:54, "Sergio Fernández" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >Hi JB, > > > >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > ><[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> Thanks Sergio ;) > >> > > > >You are welcome. > > > > > >> Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;) > >> > > > >It's a common mistake in many podlings that PPMC members thing they > >have > >binding votes over developers who are not part of the project. But > >during > >incubation only IPMC are binding votes. I hope that's clear. > > > >In theory it's simple. So sorry if I've made some noise with that. I'll > >repeat my vote later at general@incubator if you prefer it in that way. > > > >Cheers, > > > >P.S.: after 0.3.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I > >think > >you should ;-) > > > > > > > >On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fernández" > ><[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> ><[email protected]> > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective > >(you > >> >are > >> >> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you > >> >will > >> >> vote on the incubator mailing list). > >> >> > >> > > >> >Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding. > >> >That > >> >I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my > >> >vote is > >> >still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on > >general@incubator, > >> >no > >> >problem. > >> > > >> >Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer > >> >interested in Beam ;-) > >> > > >> >Cheers, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández" > >> ><[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >+1 (binding) > >> >> > > >> >> >So far I've successfully checked: > >> >> >* signatures and digests > >> >> >* source releases file layouts > >> >> >* matched git tags and commit ids > >> >> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer > >> >> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files > >> >> >* license headers > >> >> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian > >> >amd64) > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in > >> >> >upcoming > >> >> >releases: > >> >> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service > >is > >> >> >locally > >> >> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite. > >> >> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 > >can't > >> >be > >> >> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5 > >> >checksum > >> >> >lines found". > >> >> > > >> >> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-) > >> >> > > >> >> >Cheers, > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek > >> >> ><[email protected]> > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi Team! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 > >for > >> >> >version > >> >> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows: > >> >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release > >> >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific > >> >comments) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which > >> >> >includes: > >> >> >> * JIRA release notes [1], > >> >> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to > >> >> >dist.apache.org > >> >> >> [2], > >> >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository > >> >[3], > >> >> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4], > >> >> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the > >API > >> >> >reference > >> >> >> manual [5]. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on > >providing > >> >new > >> >> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make > >> >stable > >> >> >source > >> >> >> and binary artefacts available to our users. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > >> >> >majority > >> >> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Cheers, > >> >> >> Aljoscha > >> >> >> > >> >> >> [1] > >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > >> >> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051 > >> >> >> [2] > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0- > >> >> >> incubating/ > >> >> >> [3] > >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/ > >> >> >> org/apache/beam/ > >> >> >> [4] > >> >> >> > >> > >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h= > >> >> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144 > >> >> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52 > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >-- > >> >> >Sergio Fernández > >> >> >Partner Technology Manager > >> >> >Redlink GmbH > >> >> >m: +43 6602747925 > >> >> >e: [email protected] > >> >> >w: http://redlink.co > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Sergio Fernández > >> >Partner Technology Manager > >> >Redlink GmbH > >> >m: +43 6602747925 > >> >e: [email protected] > >> >w: http://redlink.co > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Sergio Fernández > >Partner Technology Manager > >Redlink GmbH > >m: +43 6602747925 > >e: [email protected] > >w: http://redlink.co > -- Neelesh Srinivas Salian Customer Operations Engineer
