+1, with enthusiasm.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Davor Bonaci <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> I'd treat this as an official vote on this procedural matter.
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Mukul Jain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Awesome work Thomas! More runner choices the better.
> >
> > Best
> > Mukul
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Great work Thomas !!
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > ⁣​
> > >
> > >> On Nov 8, 2016, 14:54, at 14:54, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> As per previous discussion [1], I would like to propose to merge the
> > >> apex-runner branch into master. The runner satisfies the criteria
> > >> outlined
> > >> in [2] and merging it to master will give more visibility to other
> > >> contributors and users.
> > >>
> > >> Specifically the Apex runner addresses:
> > >>
> > >>  - Have at least 2 contributors interested in maintaining it, and 1
> > >> committer interested in supporting it:  *I'm going to sign up for the
> > >> support and there are more folks interested. Some have already
> > >> contributed
> > >> and helped with PR reviews, others from the Apex community have
> > >> expressed
> > >>  interest [3].*
> > >> - Provide both end-user and developer-facing documentation:  *Runner
> > >> has
> > >> README, capability matrix, Javadoc. Planning to add it to the tutorial
> > >>  later.*
> > >>  - Have at least a basic level of unit test coverage:  *Has 30 runner
> > >>  specific tests and passes all Beam RunnableOnService tests.*
> > >>  - Run all existing applicable integration tests with other Beam
> > >> components and create additional tests as appropriate: * Enabled
> runner
> > >>  for examples integration tests in the same way as other runners.*
> > >> - Be able to handle a subset of the model that address a significant
> > >> set of
> > >>  use cases (aka. ‘traditional batch’ or ‘processing time
> > >> streaming’):  *Passes
> > >>  RunnableOnService without exclusions and example IT.*
> > >>  - Update the capability matrix with the current status:  *Done.*
> > >> - Add a webpage under learn/runners: *Same "TODO" page as other
> runners
> > >>  added to site.*
> > >>
> > >> The PR for the merge:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/1305
> > >>
> > >> (There are intermittent test failures in individual Travis runs that
> > >> are
> > >> unrelated to the runner.)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Thomas
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b420a35f05e47561f27c19e8ec648
> > 4f595553f32da88fe593ad931d@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > >>
> > >> [2]
> > >> http://beam.apache.org/contribute/contribution-guide/
> #feature-branches
> > >>
> > >> [3]
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e7618768cdcde81c28aa9883a1fcf
> > 4d3d4e41de4249547
> > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e7618768cdcde81c28aa9883a1fcf
> > 4d3d4e41de4249547130691d52@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E>
> > >> 130691d52@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E
> > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e7618768cdcde81c28aa9883a1fcf
> > 4d3d4e41de4249547130691d52@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E>
> >
>

Reply via email to