Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers, including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon!
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Very good point Frances. > > Definitely something we have to do. > > Regards > JB > > > On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote: > >> Sounds great, JB! >> >> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the >> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great >> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some significant >> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite >> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 is >> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating. >> >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >> Hi beamers, >>> >>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this >>> release. >>> >>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating. >>> >>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific >>> Jira >>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Regards >>> JB >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
