Daryl, Any chance that you could take a look at the patch I created and review the getNearestForm() method I added to ConfigurePopup tag class. Just concerned if there might be subtleties that we need to watch out for.
Thanks, Carlin On 9/26/05, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've updated the patch for this such that it merges and resolves conflicts > with changes from > BEEHIVE-542<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-542>and BEEHIVE-945 > <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-945>. Please ignore the > original patch and just review the newer one (j863-patch2.txt). > > If/when this first patch goes in, please reassign it to me and I can > address additional changes to finish this feature. Thanks. > > Carlin > > On 9/2/05, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've got a first cut implementation for the NetUI configurePopup tag > > support for passing form fields to a popup window (see BEEHIVE-863). Here > > are the comments I added to JIRA about the patch and some thoughts about my > > implementation... > > > > "The patch includes changes to the NetUI configurePopup tag, > > PopupSupport class, and the JavaScript in the javaScript.properties to > > add support for passing form fields to a popup window. There is now a new > > passFormFields attribute on the configurePopup tag. If this is set to true, > > then the generated JavaScript will include a function that takes the form > > name and then pulls the name/value pairs from the form fields to include as > > parameters of the query on the url of the popup window request. > > > > This patch is for post V1. Any ideas for how to best modify this patch > > to leverage or refactor existing JavaScript support for url params in the > > netui-datagrid.js would be great. Also, to get and use the > > real/generated form name within the configurePopup tag, I made a local copy > > of the HtmlBaseTag.getNearestForm() method. ConfigurePopup does not > > subclass from HtmlBaseTag and didn't think it should and I didn't see a good > > way yet to avoid the duplication so ideas appreciated here as well. > > > > The patch also includes a test page flow with popups and a testRecorder > > file. The testRecorder file may need updating if the generated JavaScript > > gets tweaked. > > > > Note that this patch builds on top of my patch for BEEHIVE-542 (multiple > > popup scripts generated). So this patch also contains those same changes as > > they are not checked into trunk. > > > > Thanks, > > Carlin > > > > >
