Please join me in welcoming Chad as our latest committer! Voting result: +1: 11 (5 binding, 6 non-binding) 0: 0 -1: 0
Congratulations, Chad! I'll follow up privately with details on how to proceed with a CLA. Eddie On 10/17/05, Kyle Marvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On 10/17/05, Kenneth Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > On 10/14/05, Alex Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Carlin Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:09 AM > > > To: Beehive Developers > > > Subject: Re: [vote] chad schoettger as a beehive committer > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I definitely agree. Nice work Chad! > > > > > > On 10/14/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > Chad's shown his mettle here. Time for us to get him on board as a > > > > committer. > > > > > > > > Daryl Olander wrote: > > > > > > > > >+1 > > > > > > > > > >On 10/14/05, Steven Tocco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>+1 from me. I think Chad has shown his quality contribution. > > > > >> > > > > >>Steve > > > > >> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > > > >>From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:45 AM > > > > >>To: Beehive Developers > > > > >>Subject: [vote] chad schoettger as a beehive committer > > > > >> > > > > >>I'd like to nominate Chad Schoettger to become a Beehive committer. > > > > >>Chad has been actively involved in Beehive for quite a while now and > > > > >>has contributed significantly in the JDBC and web service controls > > > and > > > > >>WSM. He's also helped out with documentation and samples work and > > > > >>provided various other bug fixes. > > > > >> > > > > >>I think that Chad would make a great addition to Beehive, would > > > > >>interact well with users, and ultimately help move the project > > > > >>forward. > > > > >> > > > > >>Thanks! > > > > >> > > > > >>Eddie > > > > >> > > > > >>Votes: > > > > >>[+1] Yes, Chad should be granted committer status. > > > > >>[0] Abstain / not sure. > > > > >>[-1] No, Chad isn't ready yet. If you vote this way, please provide > > > > >>an explanation why and add what can be done to address your > > > concerns. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
