Hmmm...Did you guys see the Tuscany proposal? (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113337453000005&r=1&w=2) Seems like a bit of overlap with Beehive Controls (SCA stuff). That would leave WSM, which would be a great addition to WS stack if we can port it to Axis2.
-- dims On 12/3/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This mail involves a potentially big question about the future of > Beehive; I'll try to keep it short, but if you're impatient, skip to the > middle. :) > > Ted Husted and Don Brown of Struts have proposed merging WebWork into > Struts: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg13815.html > > This is a big deal; see > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37794#192216 for > starters. > > Following from the prototyping work that we did with "Struts Ti", > they've included Beehive Page Flow as part of a Phase 2: > > > * Ti phase 1 = WebWork 2.2 + Struts 1.x compatibility library and > migration tools > > * Ti phase 2 = phase 1 + Commons Chain integration + Beehive's Page > Flow + simplified annotations + quick development mode > > ** What this means is that most of the NetUI piece of Beehive would move > into the Struts project -- refactored or rewritten to run on the core > action framework that's being developed in Phase 1. ** The question > for our community is, do we want to sign onto this? > > For my part, I am all for it. I think it would be good for Beehive > (joining forces with our "big sibling") and it would be good for Struts > (bringing in our toolability, annotation-based programming model, > etc.). We're both Apache projects, and it seems like a natural move to > make. > > What are your thoughts? Eddie and I will both be at ApacheCon along > with several of the Struts committers, so any > support/objections/questions/concerns you have before that will help us > understand where the Beehive community stands on this. > > Thanks, > Rich > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
