[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-867?page=all ]
Chad Schoettger resolved BEEHIVE-867:
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jacob Danner (was: Chad Schoettger)
This enhancement request was resolved several months ago, I'm just a bit slow
in getting this bug updated.
The resolution differed a bit from the original proposal in that support for
JAX-RPC handlers has been added by the addition of a public api to the
ServiceControl interface,
/**
* Set any JAX-RPC handlers for this client.
* @param handlers List of HandlerInfo.
*/
public void setHandlers(List<HandlerInfo> handlers);
This method can be used to set/remove handlers from the service control, each
invocation of this method sets the current set of handlers to the contents of
the handlers parameter.
> Enhance JAX-RPC Handler support in the service control
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEEHIVE-867
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-867
> Project: Beehive
> Type: Improvement
> Components: System Controls
> Reporter: Chad Schoettger
> Assignee: Jacob Danner
>
> This proposal has been discussed on the beehive dev list, for reference:
> Date: Jul 27, 2005
> Title: Design proposal for enhanced JAX-RPC handler functionality for the
> service control
> One of the primary goals of this change would be to allow service control
> users to define their own JAX-RPC handler chains for a service control.
> Currently the service control only supports the HeaderHandler (see source
> tree) which can add SOAP headers to outgoing messages and SOAP retrieve
> headers from incoming messages. There are two service control API's which
> support this: Element[] getInputHeaders() and void setOutputHeaders(Element[])
> I propose that these two API's be removed as well as the HeaderHandler class.
> The API's would be replaced with a new annotation in the ServiceControl
> interface:
> public @interface HandlerConfigParams {
> String name();
> String value();
> }
> public @interface MessageHandler {
> Class handlerClass();
> HandlerConfigParams[] configParams() default {};
> String[] headers() default {};
> }
>
> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
> @Target({ElementType.TYPE})
> public @interface MessageHandlers {
> MessageHandler[] value();
> }
> If this optional annotation is set service control would add the handlers to
> the HandlerRegistry at runtime. I'm thinking this would be a class-level
> annotation for the service control - would it also be useful to be able to
> define this on a per method basis?
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
