The changes sound fine to me. I had been thinking of updating the WSC drts to run against just AXIS instead of WSM, perhaps this wouldn't be a bad time for it once you get these changes commited.
- Chad On 5/30/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All-- Great to see the general show of support for decoupling WSM. I started the work this weekend and have it mostly done; WSM will move to the SVN URL: beehive/wsm/trunk with the usual branches/ and tags/ subdirectories as well. There was a bit of work needed to untangle wsm and the web service control. Doing this necessitated the following changes: - copy the webservice-utils classes from wsm/src to system-controls/src/webservice. WSM and the WSC now have their own classes that can evolve independently - snapshot WSM into system-controls/test/webservice so that the JSR-181 web services used in the WSC tests can be built - copy Axis 1.3 into system-controls/external/axis-1.3. This was unfortunate (see SVN comment) but necessary. I don't see a better and still expeditious way around making these changes; once everything is installed with Maven, it will be easier to satisfy the WSM dependency for the WSC tests. It seems like a good thing to avoid a code dependence between the two. Will commit these changes tonight unless there is loud squawking. :) Eddie On 5/25/06, Changshin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me as well. > > Cheers, > > Ias > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2 > > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2 > > side). > > > > -- dims > > > > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> All-- > >> > >> I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be > >> converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it significantly > >> easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it would be > >> self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging. > >> > >> The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less monolithic > >> in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without being > >> tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in > >> JSR-181 in this TSS thread: > >> > >> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280 > >> > >> The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK > >> work starts. > >> > >> Thoughts / comments / flames? > >> > >> Eddie > >> > > > > > > >
