Hi Eddie,
Needed a couple of things to get "ant clean build install test" working.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1136
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1137
thanks,
dims
On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims--
>
> One more tip (needed to make sure it worked), I'm able to do this:
>
> cd /foobar/wsm
> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/beehive/wsm/trunk .
> ant clean build install test
>
> to checkout and build a clean source tree, so if using a local M2 repo
> is easier than dealing with the one online, that's fine for now until
> nightlies builds work.
>
> Eddie
>
>
> On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heh...it's neither hourly nor nightly. Today, Beehive doesn't have
> > builds integrated into ASF infrastructure (sadly...).
> >
> > If you need to make any changes, I can just move the build to:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/dist/snapshots/maven2/
> >
> > and send you the script I used to install the JARs via Maven2 and scp.
> >
> > For any local changes, though, the WSM build will actually install
> > built JARs directly into your local Maven2 repository if that's
> > easier.
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/29/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Eddie,
> > >
> > > Great!! Is this a hourly build or a nightly build? :) Just In case i
> > > need to do any changes to beehive i can plan accordingly.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Dims / Rajith--
> > > >
> > > > I've uploaded a WSM snapshot to a Maven2 repository here:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2/
> > > >
> > > > it contains these artifacts:
> > > >
> > > > beehive-wsm
> > > > beehive-jsr181
> > > > beehive-wsdltypes
> > > > beehive-wsm-axis
> > > >
> > > > The first three would be needed to support the 181 work on Axis2; the
> > > > fourth JAR is only needed for Axis1.x.
> > > >
> > > > These should help the work to get Rajith's code integrated to the
> > > > Axis2 build.
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting to work on two more things on the WSM side:
> > > >
> > > > 1) an annotation processor extension for code generating a
> > > > services.xml file given an annotated Java source file
> > > > 2) a Maven2 archetype for building Axis2 services with WSM that would
> > > > use #1 and produce a .jar file that can be renamed to .aar and
> > > > deployed
> > > >
> > > > Let me know how the repository works out.
> > > >
> > > > Eddie
> > > >
> > > > ::::: pom.xml snip for WSM support
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>beehive-jsr181</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>beehive-wsm</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>beehive-wsdltypes</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > :::::
> > > >
> > > > ::::: Add this to your M2 settings.xml
> > > > <repository>
> > > > <id>wsm-snapshot</id>
> > > > <name>wsm-snapshot</name>
> > > >
> > > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2</url>
> > > > </repository>
> > > > :::::
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Thanks Eddie.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FYI -- will have JARs in a Maven2 repo later today. They won't be
> > > > > > mirrored, but there will be public access to them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Awesome, thanks a lot.
> > > > > > > Yes, please reply to the thread on axis2 dev about my proposed
ASM based
> > > > > > > class scanner for the drop in support.
> > > > > > > If you can or Dims can have a the jars in your maven repos, then
Dims
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > work on the patch and see how to proceed further.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks guys for the support.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rajith / Dims --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I committed Rajith's patch that adds the reflection support
for
> > > > > > > > creating a WsmService using annogen. The one change to the
patch was
> > > > > > > > that I moved the generated annogen beans from "javax.jws" to
> > > > > > > > "o.a.b.w.axis.annogen" and removed the annogen annotations from
the
> > > > > > > > "javax.jws" classes as per the legal-discuss thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This should free Dims up to start the work of applying the
Axis
> > > > > > patch.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Next steps are to upload this to my Maven repo and to talk
about
> > > > > > > > whether / how to support drop-in web service wiring in [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks and my pleasure to do the patch.
> > > > > > > > > Once we have the changes and a build in the repo, Dims can
work on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > for axis2.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you once again.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Re: The validation part and the WSDL stuff, lets take it to
the
> > > > > > > > axis-list as
> > > > > > > > > you suggested.
> > > > > > > > > We can start by publishing the questions u had on it the last
time
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > emailed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yeah -- I started looking at the patch last night and
have it up
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > running with the existing WSM tests passing. I've not done
the
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > > to just copy the source files annogen creates, but that's
the easy
> > > > > > > > > > part. :) Thanks for the patch!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dims--
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No, we've not done a nightly build for a while. With
Rajith's
> > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > (and external eyes that need to be on a WSM distributable),
I was
> > > > > > > > > > going to start publishing a WSM snapshot to a Maven2 repo on
> > > > > > > > > > people.apache.org/~ekoneil.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sound good?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > does beehive have a nightly build? are the snapshots
published
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > maven repo?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > thx,
> > > > > > > > > > > dims
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dims also things its fine to include the generated
AnnoBeans
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > treee and then remove the meta annotations from the spec
> > > > > > files,
> > > > > > > > thus
> > > > > > > > > > > > avoiding the legal issue.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, can u then check the patch and commit with
nessacery
> > > > > > > > changes.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Note the task to generate AnnoBeans is commented out !!!
> > > > > > > > > > > > Also u need to javac the generated source files
from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > location within the source tree instead of the temp
directory
> > > > > > > > where it
> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > generated.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I will attach the generated source files as a patch.
(pls add
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > the main
> > > > > > > > > > > > source tree)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know how it goes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > If we can sort this out on the wsm side then I can sort
it out
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > axis2
> > > > > > > > > > > > side with Dims help :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, thanks for your support.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1- 416- 482- 2661 x 308
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats what I thought too. Once we generate the
AnnoBeans we
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > delete the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > annotations from the spec file.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We can include the generated source as part of the
permanent
> > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > tree.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Since this is a spec file there is no need to
generate the
> > > > > > > > AnnoBeans
> > > > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and over as the spec files are static, hence the
generated
> > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > > > > > change.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So lets do that if you are ok with it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > A'right -- mail is in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will be
> > > > > > interesting
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > how that conversation turns out. :) Interested
parties
> > > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey -- something came up this weekend and I am
just
> > > > > > > > getting
> > > > > > > > > > back to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this now. My gut is that this type of metadata
> > > > > > modification
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > an API
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > class isn't going to fly (mail about this
shortly);
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > annogen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > beans are just generated from the annotations
> > > > > > themselves,
> > > > > > > > can we
> > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hand code them to match the JSR-181 annotations?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will take a look at the patch...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any update on the issue?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I totally forgot about sending the patch, but
> > > > > > finnaly
> > > > > > > > did it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review it and let me know your
comments.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We still need to figure out the legal issue
about
> > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotation to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the spec class.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Does annogen have a way around without
annotatiing
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for it to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generate the AnnoBean classes.???)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The annogen task that generates code
based on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example WebParam.Mode gives
compilation
> > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I eidted the generated source file
to get
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > working. (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is still an issue :-(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/11/06, Rajith Attapattu < [EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > oops, didn't think it was that serious about
> > > > > > modifying
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > spec
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But can u please let me know about it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >[eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me
take a
> > > > > > look at
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't even submit the patch for this
part. I
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > so.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look at it then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am really gratefull for your assitance.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/11/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Comments on both of your questions
below...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.) Annogen requires you to annotate
the
> > > > > > > > annotation
> > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > following annotation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now are we allowed to modifty the JSR
api
> > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > add the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > above
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lines of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code ??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [eko] This is a *great* question :) and
> > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we've run into this at Apache. If you
were
> > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > add a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *method*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to a type described in a specification,
the
> > > > > > answer
> > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > be no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we can't change spec classes. Since it's
> > > > > > metadata,
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > know the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > answer -- my gut would be that we can't
change
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > metadata on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > specification class, but it's a question
worth
> > > > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just to see what folks think.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta
data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The annogen task that generates
code based
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example WebParam.Mode gives
> > > > > > compilation
> > > > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > > > as it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I eidted the generated source
file to
> > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me
take a
> > > > > > look
> > > > > > > > at it
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web
Service
> > > > > > > > > > Developers)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> > >
> >
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
