Hey Rich, Excellent information. I appreciate the design explanation and will look at your suggestions, then let you know how it goes. This helps a bunch.
Thanks, Carlin On 8/14/06, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Carlin, I think what might be better would be to make a FormBeanAnnotationProcessorFactory in compiler-apt/org/apache/beehive/netui/compiler/apt, and make it responsible for the form bean annotation (you'd need to remove that annotation from the list of supported annotations in PageFlowAnnotationProcessorFactory). FBAPF could then simply return a FormBeanCoreAnnotationProcessorFactory -- which already exists -- in its getCoreProcessorFor(). I honestly cannot remember why I didn't do that -- sorry. If it turns out that this doesn't work for some reason, you could also roll the functionality from FormBeanCoreAnnotationProcessor into PageFlowCoreAnnotationProcessor (and to delete the former). In either case, you end up with standalone checking form bean classes, which is nicer because you don't have to worry about multiple PageFlowCheckers triggering checking on the same external form bean class, and it's just cleaner to have it be standalone. All that said, I didn't wire it up in the first place, so if you run into any difficulties let me know -- it's possible there's something I'm missing here. Rich Carlin Rogers wrote: > I'm taking a look at BEEHIVE-1127 and wanted to share some thoughts about > ensuring the annotation processing of validatable bean properties > declared > in an external form bean class during the check() phase. > > The current implementation for processing of the Controller > annotations does > not process external form bean during the check() phase of the > TwoPhaseCoreAnnotationProcessor. During the Controller annotation > processing, FlowControllerChecker.onCheck() creates the > FormBeanChecker and > then during the onCheckInternal() uses it to check ValidatableProperty > annotations on inner classes only. > > I'd like to modify FlowControllerChecker.checkMethod() (for action > grammar > checking) to also look at the parameter of an action and check for > validation rules. The change would only use the FormBeanChecker on the > parameter class if it is a ClassDeclaration without a declaring type > (so we > don't re-check an inner class). Does this sound right? Anyone have some > additional thoughts? > > Rich, do you have some input on this AP change? > > Thanks, > Carlin >
