How much work would there be in option #1?
Naturally it would be cleaner than option #2 but I agree with Carlin that
either option would work.
Finishing the partial data set support could then be finished when you have
time rather than rushing.
Would the impact of shipping incomplete data set support be disagreeable to
the rest of the community?
It would be useful to understand what will the ramifications of shipping
this incomplete feature might be.


On 10/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hey Eddie,

Are you thinking there would be some API changes in what you have for
the datagrid partial data set support to make it fully baked or just
some clean up? I'm not a binding vote but I'd be good with either 1 or
2 (if there's nothing drastic in API changes for data set support).

Carlin

On 10/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   Hm -- a new release would be great except...
>
>   I've started new feature work in trunk/ for supporting partial data
> sets; this work isn't baked / frozen yet.  Some options:
>
> #1) branch, remove the partial data set support, and ship 1.0.2
> #2) ship partial data set support as-is in 1.0.2
> #3) finish partial data set support and then ship 1.0.2
>
>   Thoughts?
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 10/5/06, Ken Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for a 1.0.2 patch release
> >
> > On 10/2/06, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Agreed -- seems like 1.0.2 to me...
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > Chad Schoettger wrote:
> > > > It seems like a patch release to me.  We've fixed a lot of bugs --
I
> > > > know that in the controls area there have been a number of bugs
fixed
> > > > which were found by users using Beehive from within an IDE (many
of
> > > > them APT related).  Also bugs releated to security and deadlocks
have
> > > > been addressed as well.
> > > >
> > > > I think it would be a good thing to get these fixes into a patch
> > > > release at this time.
> > > >
> > > >  - Chad
> > > >
> > > > On 9/28/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> I was wondering about the scheduling of the next beehive release.
> > > >> There's been more than 65 bugs and improvements fixed along with
a few
> > > >> smaller new features. Some of these seem like good improvements
on
> > > >> 1.0.1 and worth getting out to the user community. This includes
> > > >> things like a security fix and some page flow deadlock fixes as
well.
> > > >>
> > > >> What are the thoughts on whether this would be a patch release (
1.0.2)
> > > >> or a point release (1.1)? Just curious what folks where thinking
and
> > > >> getting a discussion started.
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards,
> > > >> Carlin
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to