> >Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > >>What should the user experience be that gets you the following output: > >> > >>1) According to Doe, "X, Y, Z" (1999:23; see also 2000). > > > >"see also" is not directly supported by BibTeX, so I would probably > >have to > >write it by hand into "Text after" field. > > Right, but since we're not talking about BibTeX, we *can* support it in > OOo. That means it can be a parameter that has a GUI analog.
No, I think we should stick to a "Text before" and "Text after" field PER SELECTED CITATION KEY (in the GUI) and not standardize the (myriad) ways in which to refer to and comment on citations (or who is misunderstanding whom now?) > How does the system know to leave off the author name(s) on the > reference? I may be wrong (I don't have the PNG here right now), but wasn't there one selector to choose a particular natbib-like variant of author-date citation formatting (\citet, \citep, \citeauthor, ...) - which would also mean that the author name in the examples you gave could be either ordinary text or a separate citation I don't really like the way endnote does this, that you have to do two separate steps (first insert, then edit the citation) to perform this very basic formatting - it should all be in the same initial window. Also, endnote does apparently not offer the possibility to leave off brackets entirely (for example if you're already inside brackets, writing more extensive text) just my thoughts, Florian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
