As a former disgruntled Endnote user, I can tell you our goal is to
produce something better. And while we are working on making it very
easy for third-parties to plug-in (including commercial products), I
wouldn't want us to waste meager resources on doing work that ISI
Researchsoft should be willing to do themselves.
But am I right that you'd be even more happy if you could avoid license
for Endnote too?
On Nov 15, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Anthony Long wrote:
Thanks for your note. I have copied the Dev and Bibliographic Dev
Projects on this email. I would encourage you to visit the
Bibliographic project for further information about the developments
underway in this area:
http://bibliographic.openoffice.org/
Thanks and Best regards,
Anthony Long
Chu Choi wrote:
Hi, my name is Chu Choi, and I have been following OpenOffice from
before v1.00.. I am a big supporter of your work, and am excited
about what OpenOffice has to offer.
I am a postdoctoral research fellow at Harvard Medical School, and
like most people, we use MS Office almost daily. I and my lab would
completely convert over to OpenOffice if there were support for the
popular program EndNote, developed by Thomson, Inc. I know I speak
for many in the scientific community who feel the same way. Our
research budgets are constrained already without shelling out
thousands for multiple licenses of MS Office, when OpenOffice is just
as good and is free.
You guys have a lot of support in our community, and I know a large
fraction of us would convert over if this plug-in were supported.
Just my thoughts.
Thanks,
Chu Choi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
