On 11/26/05, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 26, 2005, at 4:04 PM, David Wilson wrote:
>
> > my style guide tells me that 2 levels are sometimes appropriate because
> > they give this example -
> >
> > Primary Sources
> > Published
> > Unpublished
> > Secondary Sources
>
> Let me think about more then.
OK, here's a possiblity, where i only allow two-levels:
<bibliography author-as-sort-order="first-author"
author-shorten-with="———.">
<use-et_al min-authors="4" use-first="3"/>
<organization>
<heading>References</heading>
<section group-by="named group" group-name="primary">
<heading type="text">Primary Sources</heading>
<subsection>
<heading type="text">Published Sources</heading>
</subsection>
<subsection group-by="named group" group-name="unpublished">
<heading type="text">Unpublished Sources</heading>
</subsection>
</section>
<section>
<heading type="text">Secondary Sources</heading>
</section>
</organization>
<layout>
<reftype name="book">
...
<title capitalize="title case"/>
...
</reftype>
...
</layout>
</bibliography>
I still need to think on this more and see if I can make this more
automated; e.g. whether I should standardize the published/unpublished
groups as a grouping category, and therefore have the software
automatically handle that.
Bruce
