On Jan 14, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Robby Stephenson wrote:
There are pros and cons to each approach (one of the strengths of 1 is
that it could lead to compatibility between Word and Writer, because
CSL would certainly be used in both), and I have no strong opinion.
One issue I see with 1) is what happens when a custom (not installed by
default) XSL file is referenced in the ODF (from your online
repository,
for example). If the ODF file is opened somewhere else, the CSL file
would
be orphaned in a sense. Somehow there'd have to be a way to reference
its
location elsewhere.
That "XSL" is a typo; right?
I think it makes sense that CSL files always be embedded in the file
wrapper, for the same reason I think the bibliographic metadata ought
to always be embedded: to keep documents portable and self-contained.
E.g. the online repository (if it ever happens) would store styles, but
users would download them.
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]