Hi CPH,

Thanks for hanging with this.

On 1/30/06, CPHennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I'm obviously not asking the right questions of the developers on the SW
> project (or it is possible that they are not listening).

It's probably a little of both. We have consistently had
communications problems with that group. It might be impolitic to say
this on the list, but I'm getting tired of this.

> Anyway I'll like to get a few clarifications here before I go much further as
> this will help to ensure that I am asking the [EMAIL PROTECTED] guys the right
> questions :
>
> 1) we will break up the development of the new biblio code into at least X
> phases :
>   a) parsing and importation of new elements
>   b) making the relevant UNO interfaces available for manipulation
>   c) exportation of the new elements
>   d) UI specification and implementation
> 2) backward compatibility with the old elements must be maintained (and if
> possible backward compatibility with UNO objects);
>
> My comments on the above :
> - 1 (a) is half done as I think that I am correctly parsing all elements.
> However I am not sure how to change the existing code so that I can easily
> retain compatibility as per 2.

Yeah, input here would be valuable.  The model is quite different, as
right now the citation (bibliography mark) holds the metadata, which
is not a good design choice. It should instead be something like:

   citation <- - - ->  reference (metadata)  <- - - ->  bibliographic
entry (formatted reference)

As I mentioned earlier, it'd also be nice to find out if we can modify
the bibliography table generation in a backward-compatible way. E.g
extend it so it does the dynamic stuff we want, but otherwise keep the
same/similar.

> - Once 1(a) is defined then 1(b) and 1(c) should not be too difficult ( I
> hope :)
> - Obviously once the UNO model is available then you can write your trial
> dialogs using the UNO API's to get the best possible interface. This will
> then need to be specified as per http://specs.openoffice.org
>
> If the above is reasonably agreeable then I'll try to rephrase my questions
> and try to get some answers.

It looks good to me.

Bruce

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to