Bruce wrote: > Does anyone really use the existing citation support, such that > backward compatibility is a real concern? Just wondering, because we > have it as a requirement:
1. I used the database, but always started a new database for a new document, because as the database grew larger I wouldn't find the record I wanted to insert any more. (It's this stupid unsorted dropdown list.) So I have no "bibliographic database" to loose. 2. I believe the question if people are using the citation support right now is only one aspect. The other one is imho that it must be possible to correctly read and write OOO1.x and 2.0 documents, so we need some backward compatibility (or a very intelligent import/export) to ensure this. -- Matthias Basler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
