Hi, Before we go further, it would be good to understand a bit more about you and your interest in BifroMQ. In particular: • What is your current or intended use of BifroMQ? • How familiar are you with its architecture and positioning? • Are you running it (or evaluating it) in a real scenario, and if so, what concrete problems have you run into?
>From our side, being a committer is mainly about bringing practical value to the project. Well-written proposals are fine, and we’re not against using AI as a tool, but it’s hard for us to give priority to ideas that are not clearly connected to real usage or real problems. About the base-raft benchmark topic: BifroMQ is currently developed and released as an integrated system. We don’t plan to make *base-raft *a standalone, reusable Raft implementation, and so far we haven’t seen base-raft itself becoming a clear performance bottleneck in real BifroMQ deployments. Because of that, proposals that focus mainly on base-raft performance in isolation don’t naturally fit into the core BifroMQ roadmap. If your main interest is to study Raft performance itself—running benchmarks in real environments and comparing base-raft with other Raft implementations—then that kind of work probably makes more sense as an independent, experimental study. The results could still be useful as reference for future work, but it’s a different scope from driving changes inside BifroMQ directly. If you can share more concrete context about how you use BifroMQ and what problems you want to solve, it will help the community give more focused feedback. Best, On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 2:46 PM 2664504212 <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear BifroMQ community members: > In a previous discussion( > https://github.com/apache/bifromq/pull/205) about the Raft benchmark, > popduke mentioned, "You're welcome to become a committer by signing an > ICLA." > > > I have already submitted a related proposal. See: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/x6fjn9yppsbpj61zry9co6g4l2fx451l > > > This weekend, I also sent the signed ICLA to [email protected], > requesting the Apache ID hageshiame. They indicated they have received and > archived it. > > > I also intend to continue contributing to the community in the future. > What are the community's thoughts on this? > > > @popduke @Gujiawei-Edinburgh -- Yonny(Yu) Hao
