On 27 October 2012 21:51, Wing Yew Poon <wyp...@cloudera.com> wrote: > It's good to hear from someone who's been using 1.8. > I was looking recently at the version of groovy used in itest, and > surprised that it was such an ancient version (1.6). I'm in favor of > moving to a more recent stable version like 1.8. I am undecided if we > should move to 2.x. Since we are not currently using Java 1.7 yet (for > hadoop etc), I don't see the benefit as far as invokedynamic is > concerned. >
I agree
