How are we planning to deal with snappy and other libs? -Giri
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]>wrote: > not sure about the right answer to this. but you'll need protoc as well, > no? > > Alejandro > > On Nov 4, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > right now I'm faced with the boring problem of updating the > > toolchain and build slaves for the Bigtop 0.5.0 release. This > > time I decided to do it right and look at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-601 > > > > Given that at this point the content of this proposed bigtop-build > > package is going to be limited to ant, maven and forrest I'm > > wondering whether it wouldn't be nicer if packaged those 3 > > as bigtop-ant, bigtop-maven and bigtop-forrest respectively > > and had an honest build dependencies on them in our > > SPEC/control files. > > > > We can go even so far as to make sure that we track which > > of our supported platforms package that stuff natively > > and have the proper dependencies in place (if possible). > > > > I guess my biggest question is this -- on platforms where > > we would still have to have bigtop-[maven|ant|forrest] > > as a formal build dependency -- will this upset anything? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > > > P.S. This doesn't touch upon an issue of packaging JDK. > > At the moment -- I'm not solving it with the hopes that > > we can simply transition to OpenJDK 7 at some point > > (which seems to be available on most new platforms). >
