My mistake, I thought the agreement or interest in Phoenix earlier was in the context of the 0.7 BOM. Thanks for considering it even now.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said earlier - I am ok. Just brought it up for the sake of full > disclosure. > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:56PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I don't see Phoenix on the BOM for 0.7, btw > > > Not that I am picky, just saying that is hasn't been in the scope of > the > > > release. > > > > I'm personally +1 to adding it to the BOM this late in the game. > > > > My own rule of thumb is that anything NEW added to the BOM > > is pretty easy to do (provided code is +1ed, etc.) where anything > > that used to exist in a previous release that needs a version > > bump is a much trickier proposition. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
