[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

jay vyas updated BIGTOP-1136:
-----------------------------

    Description: 
One of the items which is important for emerging, more flexible hadoop 
deployments is multitenancy.  

JIRA's such as this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5571

Are very hard to test, and it would be extremely useful to many people 
deploying non standard hadoop environments , if they could test that 
multitenant and multiuser support was functional on their cluster. 

This is sort of related to the stress tests jira 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1065, also recently created.

I'm not really even sure this is possible in a fully automated / iTest sort of 
fashion... so to start, any thoughts on how bigtop should test multi user, 
multi tenant workloads?  One simple way to do it would be to launch 4 or 5 
"calculate pi" jobs at one time, maybe from different users?  But how could we 
"predict" off hand the usernames which will be available and appropriate to 
submit jobs on a cluster, without the user specifying them?

In any case, bigtop smokes is ideal for this kind of testing, because this kind 
of testing is really only applicable to a cluster which is being used by for a 
real deployment.  Other tests (i.e. pig smoke tests) are well handled and 
covered by the individual ecosystem projects.

  was:
One of the items which is important for emerging, more flexible hadoop 
deployments is multitenancy.  

JIRA's such as this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5571

Are very hard to test, and it would be extremely useful to many people 
deploying non standard hadoop environments , if they could test that 
multitenant and multiuser support was functional on their cluster. 

This is sort of related to the stress tests jira 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1065, also recently created.

I'm not really even sure this is possible in a fully automated / iTest sort of 
fashion... so to start, any thoughts on how bigtop should test multi user, 
multi tenant workloads?  One simple way to do it would be to launch 4 or 5 
"calculate pi" jobs at one time, maybe from different users?  But how could we 
"predict" off hand the usernames which will be available and appropriate to 
submit jobs on a cluster, without the user specifying them.


> Testing Multitenancy and Multiuser applications
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BIGTOP-1136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1136
>             Project: Bigtop
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Tests
>            Reporter: jay vyas
>            Priority: Minor
>
> One of the items which is important for emerging, more flexible hadoop 
> deployments is multitenancy.  
> JIRA's such as this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5571
> Are very hard to test, and it would be extremely useful to many people 
> deploying non standard hadoop environments , if they could test that 
> multitenant and multiuser support was functional on their cluster. 
> This is sort of related to the stress tests jira 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1065, also recently created.
> I'm not really even sure this is possible in a fully automated / iTest sort 
> of fashion... so to start, any thoughts on how bigtop should test multi user, 
> multi tenant workloads?  One simple way to do it would be to launch 4 or 5 
> "calculate pi" jobs at one time, maybe from different users?  But how could 
> we "predict" off hand the usernames which will be available and appropriate 
> to submit jobs on a cluster, without the user specifying them?
> In any case, bigtop smokes is ideal for this kind of testing, because this 
> kind of testing is really only applicable to a cluster which is being used by 
> for a real deployment.  Other tests (i.e. pig smoke tests) are well handled 
> and covered by the individual ecosystem projects.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to