[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13873527#comment-13873527
]
Sean Mackrory commented on BIGTOP-1173:
---------------------------------------
That's correct. That's what I meant by:
{quote}
The versionless symlink is in the -dev deb, but it should be in the other
{quote}
Anyone who has the libhdfs0-dev package installed will also have the libhdfs0
package installed, so I don't consider it a concern to be removing it from the
former, but it would be good to have the versionless symlink any time the
library itself is installed.
> Inconsistency in libhdfs* packages
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: BIGTOP-1173
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1173
> Project: Bigtop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sean Mackrory
> Assignee: Sean Mackrory
> Attachments: 0001-BIGTOP-1173.-Inconsistency-in-libhdfs-packages.patch
>
>
> There are some inconsistencies regarding our libhdfs packages
> * The versionless symlink is in the -dev deb, but it should be in the other
> * There is no -devel rpm, but there's a comment saying there should be
> * The rpm is "hadoop-libhdfs" as opposed to the "libhdfs0" deb
> The libhdfs deb package appears to be mainly named due to Debian's
> conventions for share library packages, so I don't even know if the third one
> is considered wrong, because the rpm will still be inconsistent with the
> "libhdfs0" deb.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
