[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13877207#comment-13877207
]
Roman Shaposhnik commented on BIGTOP-1186:
------------------------------------------
I'd be +1 to that. vagrant is really well integrated with puppet to a point
where it is hard to find a box that doesn't have puppet built-in. Hence I don't
think we would have any issues with Puppet not being available (or hard to
obtain) on a box. The only slight concern I have is the version of Puppet.
Do you guys know, in general, what's vagrant's community take on which version
of Puppet to embed in boxes?
> Consolidate shell/puppet vagrant provisioners.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BIGTOP-1186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1186
> Project: Bigtop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: VM
> Reporter: jay vyas
>
> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1171 we added a puppet based
> provisioner , which is superior to the shell one.
> Although the shell provisioner is easy to understand, puppet is better. Lets
> - comment and document the puppet provisioner so that its equally
> understandable to non puppet folks as the shell one and
> - delete the shell provisioner
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
