[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14143168#comment-14143168
 ] 

jay vyas edited comment on BIGTOP-1453 at 9/22/14 1:10 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for attempting to verify Roman.

Somehow they failed with class found / interface expected exception. Thats 
quite odd.   *I'll reproduce the error from scratch, or if i can't , ill close 
this JIRA.*

*There is the possibility that i was running the smoke tests from a weird 
branch or something*, and the error could have been on my end.


was (Author: jayunit100):
Thanks for attempting to verify Roman.

Somehow they failed with class found / interface expected exception. Thats 
quite odd.   I'll reproduce the error from scratch, or if i can't , ill close 
this JIRA.   

There is the possibility that i was running the smoke tests from a weird branch 
or something, and the error could have been on my end.

> 0.8 RC:  Looks like it is building Mahout1x ?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BIGTOP-1453
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1453
>             Project: Bigtop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: jay vyas
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Hi folks.  
> Looks like rc08 is using the old mahout, not the new one.  I.e. its build for 
> *hadoop 0-1x*.. not for *hadoop 2x*   .Poking aroudn on RC testing today, I 
> found this. 
> 1) yum list output shows:
>  {noformat}
> mahout.noarch                                       0.9.6-1.el6               
>                         @Bigtop
>  {noformat}
> The 0.9.6-*-1* seems suspicious.
> 2) And I ran the mahout tests on a clean RC08 repo, and I got some errors 
> indicating that it was built for hadoop 1 {{class found but interface 
> expected}}... indicating that it is an older mahout api which is running the 
> job.
> (a side note : i also  saw that pom.xml has references to hadoop 0.23, but 
> looking at other mahout packages from vendors, its clear that some how that 
> remains in the mahout pom for some reason or another , so thats not an issue. 
>  the main evidence pointing to bad mahout version is that #2 error i sited 
> above )



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to