Thanks cos, yup, It's a wrap! No change to process. Summary: the proposed vote to modify the +1 requirements resulted in ...
-1: 4 binding 0: 0 +1: 1 binding votes. so this idea was **voted down and No change to process... ** 1) Thanks for the feedback! 2) I also appreciate the alt. ideas and workarounds that were brought up which was were informed and quite sensible. Have a very bigtop Xmas! J > On Dec 24, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let's wrap the vote. It's been running for 6 days - seems to be sufficient. > Jay, will you do it, please? > > Cos > >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:02AM, jay vyas wrote: >> Hi folks. Please cast a vote on this idea,... Its not a huge deal either >> way, so don't be shy :)... Just thought I'd bring up the idea. >> >> I propose : allowing non commiters to +1 patches as sufficient for commit. >> >> Why? To increase the ability of external community members to increase >> productivity in the bigtop process. >> >> The proposal: In cases where a developer has proven comptency/expertise in >> an area of the code base, or significantly knowledgeable on the subject >> matter or patch in question, we allow a +1 as sufficient for commit. >> >> +1 : Its okay for a non-commiter to +1 a commit, and that is sufficient to >> push a patch to master. >> -1 : Only commiters can give a official +1 which substantiates to commit to >> master. >> >> >> Thanks ! >> >> Jay
