On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:55AM, Evans Ye wrote: > Oh, yes. I know. > But I was assuming that the slaves are built by Dockerfiles. > If so, we should have Dockerfiles in our repo.
+1 - having them checked in would benefit bigtop dev@ if not end-users. Roman, would you be able to commit them to the source tree? Cos > Its reasonable for users to get build slaves from BigTop's dockerhub > instead of to build them from Dockerfiles. > So I'm ok with it if we don't provide Dockerfiles. > I just want to make sure my understanding wasn't wrong :) > > Thanks, > Evans > > 2015-01-10 5:46 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > > > What Roman said. I am using these images on my laptop when I need to > > quickly > > spin-off a clean environment and not to care about soiling my own system. > > > > Cos > > > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:58PM, Evans Ye wrote: > > > Hi BigTop, > > > > > > Thanks for having bigtop_toolchain, now we can setup a bigtop build > > > environment by simply applying puppet manifests. > > > I think it will be great if we can provide build environment Docker image > > > for users. > > > The Dockerfile can leverage bigtop_toolchain to create the docker images > > > for different OS. > > > With this users will find that building their own Hadoop distro is so > > easy. > > > This can also be beneficial to our CI system without having every OS to > > > be prepared. > > > But this is just my thought, welcome yours. > > > > > > Evans > >
