[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14307410#comment-14307410
]
Sean Mackrory commented on BIGTOP-1465:
---------------------------------------
Go ahead - I started on the aforementioned ticket but I do not have bandwidth
right now to do much testing and we never settled on how exactly we wanted to
include both side-by-side. I'm +1 to include sqoop 1 as 'sqoop' and sqoop 2 as
'sqoop2'. In fact, that's exactly what I did in a Certain Distribution of
Hadoop - I'd be happy to just post all that as a patch as long as someone would
be able to test that everything deploys fine amongst the rest of the Bigtop
stack, etc..
> Include Sqoop1 in bigtop 0.9
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: BIGTOP-1465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1465
> Project: Bigtop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: general
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Guo Ruijing
> Fix For: backlog
>
>
> Bigtop 0.9 may include sqoop1:
> Sqoop2 is not intended for production deployment(http://sqoop.apache.org/)
> Latest stable release is 1.4.5 (download, documentation). Latest cut of
> Sqoop2 is 1.99.3 (download, documentation). Note that 1.99.3 is not
> compatible with 1.4.5 and not feature complete, it is not intended for
> production deployment.
> How to do?
> 1. port sqoop1 from bigtop 0.5
> 2. separate sqoop1 and sqoop2
> a) sqoop2 keeps same directory
> b) sqoop1 use sqoop1 directory as:
> ./bigtop-packages/src/common/sqoop1
> ./bigtop-packages/src/deb/sqoop1
> ./bigtop-tests/smoke-tests/sqoop1/build.gradle
> 3. sqoop1 and sqoop2 use same RPM name
> sqoop1: sqoop-1.4.4-1.noarch.rpm
> sqoop2: sqoop-1.99.3-1.noarch.rpm
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
