Good question, Dasha. I am curious to hear your thoughts on why all tests should be run under the same user. I am of the opinion that our tests should mimic how most people use our software. And, for that, they use 'hive' user for running hive queries, 'hdfs' user for writing to hdfs, etc. I'd personally like our tests to follow the same, if it's not too much work.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Dasha Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, TestCLI (and TestDFSCLI and TestHDFSCLI) fails because it needs > to be run under user hdfs. Since this isn't the case for the rest of the > hadoop-smokes, it seems like ideally we'd have a way to run *all* the tests > under the same user by making the CLIs runnable under non-hdfs users. > Unfortunately, it also seems like this is very difficult to do. > > Does anyone happen to have any suggestions? Would be greatly appreciated! > > Best, > > -- > *DASHA BOUDNIK* ENGINEERING INTERN > > *E* [email protected] > > *www.wandisco.com <http://www.wandisco.com/>* > > -- > > > 5 reasons your Hadoop needs WANdisco > <http://www.wandisco.com/system/files/documentation/5-Reasons.pdf> > > Listed on the London Stock Exchange: WAND > <http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/WAND:LN> > > THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY, AND MAY BE > PRIVILEGED. If this message was misdirected, WANdisco, Inc. and its > subsidiaries, ("WANdisco") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and > destroy the message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any > distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains > by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and > opinions expressed in this e-mail message are the author's own and may not > reflect the views and opinions of WANdisco, unless the author is authorized > by WANdisco to express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email > sent to or from this address is subject to electronic storage and review by > WANdisco. Although WANdisco operates anti-virus programs, it does not > accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being > passed. >
