Ok, we have this http://ci.bigtop.apache.org:8080/ available now. Once the server is migrated we'd need to open new ticket with INFRA to update the CNAME
Cos On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 02:02AM, Evans Ye wrote: > -1. > I'm sorry to block the 1.0 release because the default repositories in > bigtop-deploy are still in 0.8. > It's my mistake that I didn't aware of it during the long time before the > release. I apologise. > > I discovered this when doing RC tests on bigtop provisioners and puppet > recipes. > Actaully the functionality are all good, but we just need to point the repo > to 1.0 so that user can get 1.0 cluster deployed right out of the box. > If we do not update the repos, it's ok since no single function is broken. > We just have a wired release with 0.8 content mixed in... > To conclude, I think we better upgrade those default stuff in bigtop-deploy > so that we have same semantic across all the module in the 1.0 release. > I've fired BIGTOP-1958 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1958> to > apply the fix. Will upload patch soon. > Sorry again, folks. > > 2015-08-07 1:05 GMT+08:00 RJ Nowling <[email protected]>: > > > +1 to release > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Sean Mackrory <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1. Checked hashes, some minor sanity testing. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > As I mentioned above, I don't want to block the release because of > > > > this feature. I don't care either way so please keep the process of > > > > releasing! We can put it into next release. :-) > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Sorry, is it for 1.0 or for pushing Hama to the next one? > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:03PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > > > > >> Yup, +1 > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > Hello Edward. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The vote is underway and the BOM for this release has been set and > > > > agreed > > > > >> > upon. 1.0 is a major step for this project and it'd be great to > > have > > > > it out of > > > > >> > the door without anymore delays. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Past 1.0 the release process should be easier, considering that > > the > > > > CI work is > > > > >> > getting finished and we have wrapped a lot of major stuff into > > 1.0. > > > > I'd rather > > > > >> > have Hama upgrade in the following release, which we can cut > > pretty > > > > soon. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Does it make sense? > > > > >> > Cos > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:14PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > > > > >> >> Hi community, > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Please check whether BIGTOP-1126 can be added to 1.0 release. I > > > would > > > > >> >> say that the Hama 0.7 is stable enough and so should be added. Of > > > > >> >> course, this shouldn't be a blocker! > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Thanks. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Jay Vyas < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> > +1 > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:13 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> This is the vote for release 1.0.0 of Apache Bigtop. > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> It fixes the following issues: > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326837&styleName=Text&projectId=12311420 > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> This is the respin of RC2, addressing an inclusion of a build > > > > directory into > > > > >> >> >> the release artifact. The rest of the release is the same. > > > > Because of that > > > > >> >> >> let's run a shorter (2 days) vote. > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> The vote will be going for at least 48 hours and will be > > closed > > > > on Thursday > > > > >> >> >> August 5th, 2015 at 1800 PDT. Please download, test and vote > > > with > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> [ ] +1, accept RC3 as the official 1.0.0 release of Apache > > > Bigtop > > > > >> >> >> [ ] +0, I don't care either way, > > > > >> >> >> [ ] -1, do not accept RC3 as the official 1.0.0 release of > > > Apache > > > > Bigtop, because... > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> Source and binary files: > > > > >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~cos/bigtop-1.0.0-RC3 > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> Maven staging repo: > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebigtop-1003 > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> The git tag to be voted upon is release-1.0.0 > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> Bigtop's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the > > > release: > > > > >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bigtop/dist/KEYS > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> -- > > > > >> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > > > > > > > >
