On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:20PM, RJ Nowling wrote: > I think that was the second part of my statement. :) I don't see that > happening since neither Hue nor Kite are Apache projects and have no > incentive to distance themselves from particular vendors.
It isn't so much of distancing away from anything. It's more like a common sense of not using a proprietary infra (it's an implementation detail, as you should be able to plug this in via settings.xml file in your private environment) for commonly available artifacts. If I can put it bluntly - learn your tools before opening your stuff to others ;) Cos > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Or trying to convince the upstream projects to stop using their mirrors for > > what they call "open source" projects? > > > > Cos > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:05PM, RJ Nowling wrote: > > > I don't know how we'd get around it without patching the upstreams' > > > dependencies or convincing the upstream projects to use the Apache repos > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:06AM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > > > > > > > > > even hue is downloading cloudera snapshots (sic!) from maven to > > compile > > > > > against. IIRC these binaries are not bundled with "our" packaging. > > > > > > > > Yeah, Hue is another of those. Are you saying these dependencies are > > > > 'compile-time' only? If we aren't bundling anything of these 3rd party > > > > binaries to our convenience packages - I am ok. Still feels icky though > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > > > Am 10.09.2015 um 03:18 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected] > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been running the full build to validate the DSL patch and > > have > > > > noticed > > > > > > that kite downloads an enormous amount of Apache stuff from > > Cloudera's > > > > repo. > > > > > > While is bad by itself, as we have no clue what's in there, I don't > > > > understand > > > > > > why we have to bring things like httpcomponents, ant, etc from a > > 3rd > > > > party > > > > > > repo-server. That's seems quite bad to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, looking at it I see that the build creates things like > > > > > > [INFO] Building Kite Hadoop CDH5 Dependencies Module 1.1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > which creates a bad impression that Apache Bigtop is providing a > > > > commercial's > > > > > > vendors binaries. Can anyone who has the knowledge about this > > component > > > > > > address these issues somehow? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
