And done
    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bigtop/bigtop-1.0.0/repos/

Cos

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 01:08PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> My bad - we've talked about this at the apachecon and I forgot. Thanks for the
> reminder - will do it today.
> 
> Cos
> 
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:31PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> > Cos,
> > 
> > Regarding the release artifacts:
> > 
> > Is it possible to publish a KEYS file, containing the public part of the
> > sign key? BTW, This is already documented here:
> > 
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/bigtop/bigtop-1.0.0/
> > 
> > Olaf
> > 
> > 
> > > Am 10.10.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:
> > > 
> > > No, I was more after our own release signing practices. And me as the RM 
> > > for
> > > the last is to blame to not raising this earlier. We're still using md5 
> > > and
> > > sha1 to sign our releases. And I am proposing to switch to sha512, 
> > > starting
> > > from 1.1 and on.
> > > 
> > > Cos
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 08:23PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> > >> Hi Cos,
> > >> 
> > >> What signatures are targeting specifically ?
> > >> 
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.io.MD5Hash and its usage?
> > >> 
> > >> or
> > >> 
> > >> something like
> > >> 
> > >> bigtop-packages/src/deb/hama/rules:              dh_md5sums
> > >> bigtop-packages/src/common/pig/do-component-build:  echo 
> > >> "ea58a078e3861d4dfc8bf3296a53a5f8  apache-forrest-0.9.tar.gz" 
> > >> >apache-forrest-0.9.tar.md5
> > >> bigtop-packages/src/common/pig/do-component-build:  if ! md5sum  -c 
> > >> --quiet apache-forrest-0.9.tar.md5 ; then
> > >> 
> > >> or  ???
> > >> 
> > >> Olaf
> > >> 
> > >>> Am 09.10.2015 um 23:02 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:
> > >>> 
> > >>> Guys,
> > >>> 
> > >>> We had to get rid of md5 sum long time ago, but it seems that sha1 is 
> > >>> hitting
> > >>> the wall as well. Here's the good description of the problem:
> > >>>   https://sites.google.com/site/itstheshappening/
> > >>> 
> > >>> I'd suggest to scrape both of them in the next release. Any objections?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Cos
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to