Thank you very much Yeongeon - looking forward for your contribution!

Cos

On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 11:00PM, YEONGEON wrote:
> Thank for your mention.
> I reviewed the issue(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2078) in
> detail again and understood what it means.
> I also think it would be better to add the Tajo at the Bigtop 1.2 after. I
> will try to build more carefully to go well with the Bigtop.
> 
> Yeongeon
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-11-07 10:49 GMT+09:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:
> 
> > I'd say if it is integrated into the stack before the release branch is
> > cut-off it'd be great to have it. Otherwise there's going to be 1.2 shortly
> > after.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 10:23AM, YEONGEON wrote:
> > > I'm going to add Tajo 0.11.0 (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1641) on Bigtop.
> > > If it would be possible, I could try pull-request until end of Nov.
> > >
> > > 2015-11-07 6:28 GMT+09:00 Grimes Michael <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > It¹d be nice to get Oozie 4.2.0 in as well
> > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1915). 4.0.1 is over two
> > > > years old. I¹ll be uploading a patch for it here pretty soon.
> > > >
> > > > On 11/6/15, 12:53 PM, "Olaf Flebbe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Just included the long overdue hue-3.9 update.
> > > > >
> > > > >I have a couple of puppet code changes I like to commit.
> > > > >
> > > > >Olaf
> > > > >
> > > > >> Am 06.11.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Guys,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I have put a draft of 1.1 BOM to
> > > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2078
> > > > >> Thinking of making the release before the end of November. What's
> > the
> > > > >> community take on this? And if there anyone who wants to do the RM
> > this
> > > > >>time
> > > > >> around?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Looks like we are mostly ok. excluding
> > > > >>    Phoenix     (BIGTOP-1942)
> > > > >>    Zeppeling   (BIGTOP-1769)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Could perhaps component maintainers to take a look at these two?A
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Anything else we should be including? Thanks
> > > > >>  Cos
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to