On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:22PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > Hi > > I am talking about Bigtop-trunk not Bigtop-trunk-packages. > http://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-trunk/
Oh, my bad, sorry. Packages are a part of our CI pipeline and serves a different purpose of course. > That's the all-in-one thingy- opposed to the great visualisation of packages > vs operating system matrix. > > I tried several aproaches to create a repository out of Bigtop-trunk-packags > but it turned out really complicated. Bigtop-trunk already generates Yeah, there's a bit hurdle with that. I have shared a link to a couple of scripts I've put together for a project I am doing, which essentially allows to collect together all the packages from the dockerized build and then create the repos. For the release (RC or whatever) we should use the Bigtop-trunk of course - it's a one-off build essentially. I think this is what Evans have done to build 1.0.0 binary artifacts. Thanks! Cos > repositories, so I suppose we should carve 1.1 repositories out of > Bigtop-trunk rather assembling back the artifacts of Bigtop-trunk-packages. > See for instance: > http://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-trunk/BUILD_ENVIRONMENTS=debian-8,label=docker-slave/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/apt/ > > Olaf > > > stantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > > > > > > I might be color-challenged %) then > > http://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/Packages/job/Bigtop-trunk-packages/ > > > > cos > > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 06:43PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> updating the CI Infrastructure made Bigtop-trunk all blue. > >> > >> I will disable the nexus workaroung now for Bigtop-trunk-packages . A new > >> bigtop/slaves:trunk-opensuse-13.2 image is pushed > >> > >> > >> Olaf > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
