On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 08:44PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > I do not know if the german phrase translates correctly into english.  "I 
> > am getting an neck like this ..." ;-)
> 
> ;-)
> 
> > This package is a tremendous waste of resources in our CI.  It needs 1,5 
> > hours compilation time of our
> > total 5 hour compilation. We will save over 15 elapsed hours (do not know 
> > how it translates into
> > CPU hours) every day. (6 Bigtop-trunk-packages and 5 Bigtop-trunk). Of 
> > course we are spending this in parallel ...
> >
> > There is an obvious fix to reduce the number of rebuilds down by an factor 
> > of 3, but this is still way to much.
> > (That will be ~ 4 total rebuilds) If there is an explanation for this, fine.
> 
> The above is the silliness in how Giraph builds documentation. I'm
> going to tweak
> do-component-build to actually not build docs (since they are not too useful
> anyway ATM). That should fix it.
> 
> > And BTW: Please consider committing  BIGTOP-1022 first.
> 
> Good point. Will do.
> 
> > Otherwise I propose to add an JIRA reading "Remove giraph until build 
> > process is fixed".
> 
> Still, what's the JIRA ID for this?

Evidently, you'd have to create one.

Cos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to