Cos and Roman
Thanks for pushing hard on the 1.1 release!
The PPC packages are available here:
https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/ppc64le/job/Bigtop-trunk-packages-ppc64le

Asanjar
I guess we can not easily put together PPC and the other packages together
in same release job because ubuntu-15.04-ppc64le require a ppc slave, right?


2016-02-17 13:40 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:

> Two things:
>  - the packages for ppc 1.1.0 aren't available anywhere. Looks like the job
>    you have put together failed. Sorry, I am half across the world and
> dealing
>    with a lot right now, so I can not spare any time to fix it
>  - you can go ahead and make the announcement. Binary artifacts aren't a
> part
>    of the official release. The official release is done a available from
>      http://www.apache.org/dist/bigtop/bigtop-1.1.0/
>
> Packages will be posted later - not big of a deal
>
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 06:54PM, MrAsanjar . wrote:
> > Roman, thanks man. Let me know when repo will be updated with ppc
> packages.
> > I am at Spark Summit East and would like to make an announcement as soon
> as
> > you give the thumbs up.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks for all! I tested some random packages from the centos-7 repo.
> > > Works like a charm.
> > >
> > > The debian-8 GPG signature can be downloaded from the gpg keyserver,
> works
> > > for me.
> > > I suggest to add a KEYS file with Romans Signing Key 13971DA39475BD5D
> into
> > > http://<mirror>/apache/bigtop/bigtop-1.1.0/
> > >
> > > But anyway, great job, we did it!
> > >
> > > Olaf
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 16.02.2016 um 17:42 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > Weird indeed. I checked for myself and it was there. Anyway - thanks
> a
> > > bunch
> > > > for your help!
> > > >
> > > > Guys, if you can do some quick sanity tests in addition to what I
> have
> > > done
> > > > earlier - it'd be great! Right after we can do the official
> announcement
> > > of
> > > > the release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >  Cos
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 08:34AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> Looks like the repos were published earlier today by Roman (thanks
> > > dude!)
> > > >>> A couple of small nits:
> > > >>> - we still need to add repos/ directory into the dist's
> release/bigtop
> > > (like
> > > >>>   we did before)
> > > >>> I have added the repos/ into the release area.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks man! I've pushed the signatures.
> > > >>
> > > >>> - the signing key 9475bd5d doesn't seem to be added to the KEYS,
> nor
> > > is a
> > > >>>   part of the repos/ (obviously)
> > > >>
> > > >> This is odd, the key is definitely in the canonical file. See for
> > > yourself:
> > > >>
> > > >> $ rm -rf /tmp/12345 ; mkdir /tmp/12345
> > > >> $ curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bigtop/KEYS >
> > > /tmp/12345/KEYS
> > > >> $ GPG_HOME=/tmp/12345  gpg --import /tmp/12345/KEYS
> > > >> gpg: key 3ADD02D6: "Andrew Bayer (CODE SIGNING KEY)
> > > >> <[email protected]>" not changed
> > > >> gpg: key 9475BD5D: "Roman V Shaposhnik (CODE SIGNING KEY)
> > > >> <[email protected]>" not changed
> > > >> gpg: key 1F27E622: "Konstantin I Boudnik (Cos) <[email protected]>"
> not
> > > changed
> > > >> gpg: Total number processed: 3
> > > >> gpg:              unchanged: 3
> > > >>
> > > >>> I have tried to deploy and quickly test centos and ubuntu in-docker
> > > clusters
> > > >>> and the basic setup seems to be working fine.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cool! Lets see if this key issue is transient on your part.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Roman.
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to