I recall having one conversation with him when he worked at Hortonworks (maybe 
still does? - I don't know) about adding a RPM build target to HBase, which 
didn't make much sense for us in my present opinion, and I believe we politely 
declined at the time. I presumed he was involved with distribution packaging 
there. 


> On Mar 12, 2016, at 9:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Who's that fella anyway? I have a vague recollection that he was at Y!,
> walking around and whining about everything? Or was it a different Eric? I am
> getting old and want to forget all the unpleasant episodes in my life.
> 
> Anyway, his logic is flawed and lead us to the extreme where we just have to
> stop using any software out there, because there might be some vulnerability.
> While we need to strive to make our product better and safer for users, there
> are also realities and things we do not control. 
> 
> There's quite positive part in this whole discussion: I really like that the
> other people in the ecosystem look at us as the de-facto focal point of the
> stack integration. I think the mission is accomplished! But let's not rest
> here just yet ;)
> 
> Cos
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:30PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> our good friend Eric Yang has been at it again: spreading
>> FUD about Bigtop: https://s.apache.org/KglM
>> 
>> Nothing new, aside from this quote:
>> ====================================================
>> Bigtop contains /lib/lsb/init-functions which will import redhat-lsb-core
>> which imports exim. Exim is known for common root escalation
>> vulnerability. If you value your cluster security, I would recommend to
>> think twice before using BigTop.
>> ====================================================
>> 
>> Could someone who's dealt with security for real (Olaf -- your
>> name came to mind immediately) please comment on that
>> JIRA thread?
>> 
>> Typically I wouldn't feed Eric 'the troll' Yang, but I think having
>> this type of allegation in a public record could be pretty bad for
>> us.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.

Reply via email to