Hi!
as BIGTOP-2282 indicated it seems that we have a bit
of a difference in opinion on how major version bumps
in the stack need to be handled. Spark 1 vs 2 and Hive
1 vs 2 are a good examples.
Since JIRA is not always the best medium for a discussion
I wanted to get this back to the mailing list.
My biggest question is actually around the goals/assumptions
that I wanted to validate with y'all.
So, am I right in assuming that:
#1 our implicit bias is to NOT have multiple version of
the same component in a stack?
#2 we try to figure out what version is THE version based
on how ready the component is to be integrated with the
rest of the stack
#3 if somebody wants to do the work to support an extra
version -- that's fine, but that version gets the digit
as in spark1 and also that person gets to do all the work
Thanks,
Roman.
