Hi Olaf! not sure what you mean -- those 3 have one JIRA assigned to each of them. See below:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: > Cos, > > Surely you are referring to other commits, unless you are joking. > > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/commit/40fd25e52cace1245dd669307326c3cb20044335 ODPI-129 > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/commit/ba4c1bf7e29ba639137259308d8b6e0252ef7fb9 ODPI-100 > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/commit/d78693bed54fbb239aacff939a2e03663050d887 ODPI-72 Now, when we bring it into Bigtop -- there's no need to file 3 JIRAs -- beacause the end result is what we're after. In this sense it is no different from somebody working on the BIGTOP JIRA and having a few commits in their history. Most of the time -- we're not interested in how the person was fixing internal bugs -- we're interested in the end result. That's why we typically ask to squash. But there's not policy to force the squashing. As I said -- I believe for ODPi's case we have a good reason not to -- but I'd be fine with squashing. Hence this thread ;-) Thanks, Roman.
