OK. I think if we can't get it fixed soon, we can still explain how to
evaluate our release on the download page. BIGTOP-2892
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2892> is opened for this.

To summarize the vote result:

The vote is REJECTED with 3 binding +1s, 1 binding -1 and 1 non-binding -1.

Thanks for voting!





2017-10-20 0:05 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:

> Yes, the checksum matches the file - no problem with that. However,
> sha1sum (and all other SHA's for that matter) look like this
> %  sha1sum /etc/passwd
> f36e0ac05f911c031660a8737628d4f0595af2c4  /etc/passwd
>
> When you later run
>
> % sha1sum /etc/passwd.sha1
> is will validate the file automatically. The checksum in the 1.2.1
> only includes the hash, so the validation needs to be done manually.
>
> Looks like we were producing the sums like that before (likely the
> maven thing), so it isn't specific to 1.2.1. I will open a bug (unless
> one exists to fix the situation).
>
> Thanks!
> --
>   With regards,
> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>
> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Evans Ye <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thank you all for participating the vote!
> > I'll revise the release and put up another vote soon.
> >
> > To be fixed:
> > * giraph-examples.jar (fixed in BIGTOP-2908
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2908>)
> > * PPC64LE repos (fixed in BIGTOP-2903
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2903>)
> >
> > Thanks Kevin for quick patches.
> >
> > Something I'm confused:
> >
> > - sha1 (the file is malformed, which makes sha1sum -c impossible)
> (passed)
> > I have tested this and it seems the sha1 of bigtop-1.2.1-project.tar.gz.
> sha1
> > matches what contained in bigtop-1.2.1-project.tar.gz.sha1. Can you
> > elaborate the problem?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-10-19 5:01 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> +1 on the release note addition.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 03:34PM, Kevin Monroe wrote:
> >> > Roger that Cos.  In a separate thread, Evans mentioned that ppc64le
> >> > convenience artifacts can be uploaded later.. My objection is that
> >> ppc64le
> >> > users may want to try the new release on announce, yet be discouraged
> >> when
> >> > the repos aren't able to deliver.
> >> >
> >> > Let's at least call this out in the release notes.  Thanks!
> >> > -Kevin
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I see where you're going, Kev. But stricktly speaking, we are only
> >> voting
> >> > > on
> >> > > the source code of the release. Binaries are provided for the
> >> convenience
> >> > > only.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >   Cos
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 03:07PM, Kevin Monroe wrote:
> >> > > > -1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > AFAICT, it is not possible to deploy 1.2.1 on ppc64le because
> there
> >> are
> >> > > no
> >> > > > binaries for that arch in the repo.  While my vote isn't binding,
> it
> >> > > feels
> >> > > > wrong that we would release 1.1.0 and 1.2.0 with this arch, yet
> make
> >> it
> >> > > > unavailable for 1.2.1.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Good repo in 1.2.0:
> >> > > > http://bigtop-repos.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/1.2.0/
> >> ubuntu/16.04/ppc64le
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Bad repo in 1.2.1:
> >> > > > http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
> 04/ppc64le
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Specific error for 1.2.1 on ppc64le:
> >> > > > E: Failed to fetch
> >> > > > http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
> >> > > 04/ppc64le/dists/bigtop/contrib/binary-ppc64el/Packages
> >> > > > 404  Not Found
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > -Kevin
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Evans Ye <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > This is the vote for release 1.2.1 of Apache Bigtop.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > It fixes the following issues:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> > > > > version=12340373&projectId=12311420
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed
> on
> >> > > Sunday,
> >> > > > > October 15th, 2017 at noon PDT.  Please download, test and vote
> >> with
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > [ ] +1, accept RC1 as the official 1.2.1 release of Apache
> Bigtop
> >> > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >> > > > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC1 as the official 1.2.1 release of
> Apache
> >> > > Bigtop,
> >> > > > > because...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Source and binary files:
> >> > > > >         https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> >> dist/dev/bigtop/bigtop-1.2.1-
> >> > > RC1/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Maven staging repo:
> >> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> > > orgapachebigtop-1015
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The git tag to be voted upon is release-1.2.1-RC1
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Bigtop's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> >> > > > >         https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bigtop/KEYS
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >>
>

Reply via email to