On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:34PM, Evans Ye wrote: > I wrote it with ruby just because it works. I’d favor to reduce any package > required to be installed, if possible.
Yup, I totally understand and appreciate it - no critique here ;) > Just wondering what’s the problem you are facing? Is Python most likely to > be available out of the box? Well, funny enough it was the case with this box. The Python was right there. But nonetheless, I think the reliance on two (or more) things instead of one just adds the complexity and could be reduced. If there's no objection I will take a shot at it. And once again - I am so glad the docker provisioner is here! Makes my life easier...! Thanks, Cos > Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>於 2019年5月28日 週二，下午8:21寫道： > > > Hey fellas. > > > > I am preparing for a small demo, using a brand new install Linux > > installation. And a couple of things came to my attention: > > > > -- python is missing 'six' package > > -- the docker-hadoop.sh is using Ruby > > > > The first one is a small env issue, but I wonder why do we need need Ruby > > to > > (if I am not mistaken) parse a yaml config? It seems like an old code going > > back to 2016. Would anyone mind if I supply a patch to replace it with some > > tiny python hack? > > > > Thoughts? > > Cos > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
