Hi,

Systemd version 241 will be in the next stable version of debian, called 
"buster"

Debian Buster is not supported today, anything might happen. Interesting to 
note that systemd seems to break. Has to be investigated. Guadong Xu, please 
file a JIRA ticket .

I recommend to stick with debian 9 (called stretch) for now.

Olaf



> Am 24.06.2019 um 19:32 schrieb Evans Ye <[email protected]>:
> 
> First thing we can do is to cross validate this with our CI:
> 
> https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/Test/job/Bigtop-trunk-smoke-tests-1.4.0/
> 
> From your log it seems that failure happens at deployment stage, while our
> CI are good on Debian 9 with ARM and X86. I checked that both arm and x86
> images are using following systemd version:
> 
> root@04812187f0f2:~# systemd --version
> systemd 232
> +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA +APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP
> +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN
> 
> The version diff is probably the reason as what you investigated. I don't
> have any idea yet. Maybe other folks at Bigtop can chime in?
> 
> 
> Guodong Xu <[email protected]> 於 2019年6月24日 週一 下午4:18寫道:
> 
>> Hi, all
>> 
>> I found a crucial failure related to 'systemd' when installing Bigtop 1.4
>> onto Debian 9. (Problem may exist on other versions of bigtop releases as
>> well, but I didn't test).
>> 
>> The issue is when running '# systemctl  status flink-taskmanager', it
>> always fail with such message:
>> Jun 24 07:28:59 j12-d05-09 systemd[1]: flink-taskmanager.service: New main
>> PID 26238 does not belong to service, and PID file is not owned by root.
>> Refusing.
>> 
>> A further investigation leads me to this similar bug report in VNC: a bug
>> report from VNC users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583159
>> 
>> And to this change commit in systemd: commit link:
>> 
>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/db256aab13d8a89d583ecd2bacf0aca87c66effc
>> 
>> "core: be stricter when handling PID files and MAINPID sd_notify()
>> messages"
>> 
>> Did anybody see this issue before? Should I log a bug for it? Solutions
>> maybe? Thanks a lot.
>> 
>> PS, my 'systemd' version is:
>> # systemd --version
>> systemd 241 (241)
>> +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA +APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP
>> +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD -IDN2 +IDN
>> -PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Guodong Xu
>> 

Reply via email to