Bigtop adopted the Ambari stable version (2.7.5) as the cluster management
tools for the potential developers and administrators. It also provided the
bigtop-ambari-mpack(Bgtp-Mpack) to decouple stack management and definition
from Ambari's core.
Currently Bgtp-Mpack still just supports Bigtop-1.5 (Hadoop 2.x), but the
Bigtop has already supported Hadoop 3.x in Bigtop 3 release. So we plan to
start working on upgrading Bgtp-Mpack services from Bigtop-1.5 (Hadoop 2.x)
to  Bigtop-3 (Hadoop-3.x).

BRs,
Yuqi



Michiel Verheul <[email protected]> 于2022年5月19日周四 03:56写道:

> Personally I'm struggling with the exactly the  same issue. There was
> already some kind of discussion on this topic here, earlier:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wj898zq8q348721xf460mttqlty4v3zw
>
> Personally I have never ran a production cluster without CM before. Bigtop
> 3 with Ambari seemed ideal, but as there was no ambari-mpack for bigtop 3
> yet, I put some energy in porting the HDP mpack to support bigtop.
> But I can understand that maintaining such a component under the Bigtop
> project is a no-go, because of Ambari's attic state, Python 2.7 and the
> (un)maintainability of such an mpack, so I stopped working on that.
>
> From what I also understand from the above thread, 李帅 is already working on
> some light weight ambari alternative. It feels like that would be a good
> way forward but I don't know how much work has to be done to make this work
> and if it's still viable?
>
> The alternative would be running vanilla hadoop/bigtop. I don't have any
> experience with it but I guess the most important gaps for me will be:
>
> - initial installation (with support for Kerberos and SSL)
> - (rolling) service restarts
> - basic service monitoring (is a service running or down?)
>
> Maybe we just have to put some energy in creating puppet/Ansible scripts
> for this purpose and just forget about Ambari.
>
>
> Op wo 18 mei 2022 20:07 schreef Battula, Brahma Reddy
> <[email protected]>:
>
> > Supposed to ask same question @Martin Blom here.
> > IMO, still Ambari will be good choice for cluster management. I think,
> > most/some amount of people from bigtop(who are using for building the
> > packages) still use ambari.
> >
> > Planning to take collective opinion on bring back even with some other
> > name if not with same name.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this..?
> >
> >
> > On 18/05/22, 6:28 PM, "李帅" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     Maintaining Ambari is not easy for its complex architecture. There
> are
> > many
> >     Configuration Management Tools such as Puppet, Ansible for
> > alternatives. So
> >     for me, I will try to use Puppet or Ansible to deploy and monitor
> > cluster.
> >     Using Puppet and Ansible without Ambari-like web ui will be a gap for
> >     common users.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Martin Blom <[email protected]> 于 2022年5月18日周三 17:04写道:
> >
> >     >
> >     > Hi all. I'm new here.
> >     >
> >     > So at work we provide a service that's been running flawlessly on
> > top of
> >     > HDP since at least 2014. The recent "events" (which we became aware
> > of only
> >     > late last year, when it was already too late) had us panicking a
> bit
> > at
> >     > first, since we realised we could no longer manage our cluster, but
> > we've
> >     > since then been able to track down repo mirrors so the immediate
> > crisis is
> >     > over (no thanks to Cloudera).
> >     >
> >     > However, with HDP dead and CentOS 7 nearing EOL, it's clear that we
> > need
> >     > to move on. While we have evaluated both CDP, GCP Dataproc and even
> >     > considered migrating from HBase to Bigtable, Bigtop seems like the
> > only
> >     > sensible way forward. We just want a small database/MQ backend
> > cluster that
> >     > keeps running forever to power our service.
> >     >
> >     > Which brings us to Ambari. I really liked Ambari, for cluster
> > management
> >     > obviously but also so for monitoring, and it has worked great for
> us
> > all
> >     > those years. A lot of work has obviously been put into Ambari and
> it
> > seems
> >     > like such a waste to throw it all away.
> >     >
> >     > What are this Bigtop's plans for Ambari, the upstream project being
> >     > retired and all?
> >     >
> >     > For us, we would like to bring us to the point were, in 2024 when
> > CentOS 7
> >     > goes EOL, we can bring up a new cluster on Rocky 8 with HDFS, Yarn,
> > HBase,
> >     > Kafka and Zookeeper using Ambari to manage, monitor and keep it up
> > and
> >     > running like that until at least 2029 when RL8 retires. It doesn't
> > seem
> >     > *that* difficult given the HDP 3.1 vs Bigtop 3.0.1 BOMs for the
> > components
> >     > we need. We would also be willing to put some time into making that
> >     > happening.
> >     >
> >     > What are your thoughts on that? Is anybody here still interested in
> >     > Ambari? Has anybody actually been using it to manage Bigtop
> > components?
> >     >
> >     > PS. Also cross-posting to user. Anybody else in my situation? What
> > are you
> >     > all using to monitor your clusters once deployed?
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > Martin Blom
> >     > [email protected]
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to