Masatake,

Thank you so much for driving this release!

+1 (binding)

* Verified signature and checksum
* Confirmed that the source tarball is the same as the RC0-tagged
codebase except for dotfiles and CI-related things
* Confirmed that packages can be built with the source tarball
* Confirmed that a Hadoop cluster can be deployed using binary packages

Kengo Seki <[email protected]>

On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 5:24 PM Evans Ye <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Masatake,
>
> Agreed repos are for convenience so do not affect the release binaries.
> +1.
> Thanks for the hard work!
>
> - Evans
>
> Masatake Iwasaki <[email protected]> 於 2026年8月6日週四 上午4:09寫道:
>
> > > The RC0 BOM specifies Livy 0.9.0
> > > <
> > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/blob/release-3.6.0-RC0/bigtop.bom#L326-L333
> > >,
> > > but every x86_64 repository contains Livy 0.8.0, while the corresponding
> > > ARM64 repository contains 0.9.0.
> >
> > Nice catch.
> > I guess I forgot to re-run the (relevant part of) packaging CI job after
> > merging BIGTOP-4530.
> > I rebuilt the Livy packages and replaced the uploaded ones.
> >
> > *
> > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-x86_64/DISTRO=rockylinux-9,PLATFORM=amd64-slave,PRODUCT=livy/
> > *
> > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-x86_64/DISTRO=fedora-40,PLATFORM=amd64-slave,PRODUCT=livy/
> > *
> > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-x86_64/DISTRO=openeuler-22.03,PLATFORM=amd64-slave,PRODUCT=livy/
> > *
> > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-x86_64/DISTRO=debian-12,PLATFORM=amd64-slave,PRODUCT=livy/
> > *
> > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-x86_64/DISTRO=ubuntu-24.04,PLATFORM=amd64-slave,PRODUCT=livy/
> >
> > The smoke-tests is running based on the updated Livy packages.
> > The tests of Spark and Livy are a bit flaky on CI machines
> > due to limited resources.
> >
> > * https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-smoke-tests/
> >
> > The tests passed on my local machines.
> > I verified that the Livy 0.9.0 was downloaded and installed as expected.
> >
> > Since pre-built binaries provided for users' convenience do not affect
> > signed release artifacts, I think we do not need to sink the RC0.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Masatake Iwasaki
> >
> > On 8/6/2026 8:50 AM, Evans Ye wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I think there's a mismatch between the RC0 source and the published
> > package
> > > repositories.
> > >
> > > The RC0 BOM specifies Livy 0.9.0
> > > <
> > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/blob/release-3.6.0-RC0/bigtop.bom#L326-L333
> > >,
> > > but every x86_64 repository contains Livy 0.8.0, while the corresponding
> > > ARM64 repository contains 0.9.0.
> > >
> > > Reproduce steps:
> > >
> > > docker run --rm --platform linux/amd64 debian:12-slim sh -c '
> > > apt-get update >/dev/null &&
> > > apt-get install -y curl gnupg >/dev/null &&
> > > curl -fsSL \
> > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bigtop/bigtop-3.6.0-RC0/repos/GPG-KEY-bigtop
> > > |
> > >    gpg --dearmor -o /usr/share/keyrings/bigtop.gpg &&
> > > echo "deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/bigtop.gpg]
> > > http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/3.6.0/debian/12/amd64 bigtop
> > > contrib" \
> > >    > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bigtop.list &&
> > > apt-get update >/dev/null &&
> > > apt-cache policy livy
> > > '
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > livy:
> > >    Installed: (none)
> > >    Candidate: 0.8.0-1
> > >    Version table:
> > >       0.8.0-1 500
> > >          500
> > http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/3.6.0/debian/12/amd64
> > > bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
> > >
> > > The cause is visible in Jenkins. The x86_64 Livy build
> > > <
> > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-3.6.0-x86_64/DISTRO=ubuntu-24.04,PLATFORM=amd64-slave,PRODUCT=livy/4/consoleText
> > >
> > >   checked out commit 7477ca4 and downloaded Livy 0.8.0. The upgrade to
> > 0.9.0
> > > <
> > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/commit/f81ee3aa45cabea815416e8dbc716e87957a568e
> > >
> > >   was committed about eight minutes after that build started.
> > >
> > >
> > > The rest looks good to me! Shall we align the version?
> > >
> > > - Evans
> > >
> > > Masatake Iwasaki <[email protected]> 於 2026年8月3日週一 上午3:55寫道:
> > >
> > >> Hi Bigtop PMC members,
> > >>
> > >> I'm still waiting for the vote.
> > >> I will appreciate your help for the release process.
> > >> We need 2 more +1 in addition to mine.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Masatake Iwasaki
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 6:04 PM Masatake Iwasaki <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> This is the vote for release 3.6.0 of Apache Bigtop. (RC0)
> > >>>
> > >>> It fixes the following issues:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12356069&styleName=Text&projectId=12311420
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours.
> > >>> Please download, test and vote with
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1, accept RC0 as the official 3.6.0 release of Apache Bigtop
> > >>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > >>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC0 as the official 3.6.0 release of Apache
> > >>> Bigtop, because...
> > >>>
> > >>> Source and binary files:
> > >>>      https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bigtop/bigtop-3.6.0-RC0/
> > >>>
> > >>> Maven staging repo:
> > >>>
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebigtop-1056
> > >>>
> > >>> The git tag to be voted upon is release-3.6.0-RC0:
> > >>>      https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/release-3.6.0-RC0
> > >>>
> > >>> Bigtop's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > >>>      https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bigtop/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> The results of packaging, deployment and smoke tests on the CI
> > >>> environment are as follows:
> > >>>
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+3.6.0+Support+Matrix
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Masatake Iwasaki
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >

Reply via email to