This is now also in jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-96
On 27 March 2013 07:57, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, I have updated the ticket. > > > On 27 March 2013 07:45, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 27.03.2013 07:40, Peter Koželj wrote: >> > I was thinking about that but each one alone does not warrant 2 months >> > coding effort. >> >> I meant split into two goals within one GSoC project. >> >> The thing is, I suspect that the WYSIWYG workflow editor might be just a >> bit too much for two months. So, it needs some infrastructure -- I >> expect the internal API will be table-based in any case -- and exposing >> that in the UI should be close to trivial, so that the project would >> have something to show relatively early. >> >> -- Brane >> >> > On 27 March 2013 07:30, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On 27.03.2013 07:19, Peter Koželj wrote: >> >>> I hope I am not to late, I have added >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/490 to the list. >> >>> What do you think? >> >> Not bad, but I'd split it in two; the first step (required) would be a >> >> table-based workflow editor, modelled after Redmine's, for example. The >> >> second step (optional) would be the WSYWIG thing. >> >> >> >> -- Brane >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Branko Čibej >> >> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Branko Čibej >> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com >> >> >
