On 4/8/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/04/13 15:41, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On 4/7/13, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 08.04.2013 05:15, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>>> On 4/7/13, Marco Mangiante <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>> After this I followef the
>>>>> guide and al seems ok, but I written the address in the browser bar I
>>>>> obtained the error reported.  I gave a "netstat -ano" at prompt and I
>>>>> noticed that ther is no listening on 8080, (8080 port is not present):
>>>>> after
>>>>> this I went on /etc/apache2 and added the lines  NameVirtualHost
>>>>> *:8080
>>>>> Listen 8080
>>>>>   in the file ports.conf . After this I can see a listening port 8080
>>>> Yes , that's required . I didn't see it in the guide but figured this
>>>> out by myself . Shall we add this step in there too ?
>>> /If/ you configure bloodhound on a virtual host listening on port 8080,
>>> then it's required. However, in general, there's no need to do so.
>>>
>> yes, brane , that's exactly the point . The VirtualHost snippet in
>> wiki:BloodhoundInstall will make apache2 to listen in port 8080 . I'll
>> add a quick note on the subject later
>> ;)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
> I don't want the instructions to be too complicated as we shouldn't
> really be telling everyone all the options for setting up their
> webserver.

I was thinking of adding something like «Notice that sample
configuration will make apache2 server listen to incoming requests in
non-standard port ''8080''. If you are experiencing any problems ,
please read further details in
[wiki:BloodhoundTroubleshooting#httpd-port troubleshooting guide]» and
add something in BloodhoundTroubleshooting

> It might be more appropriate to provide an example of how to
> get it going on port 80 instead.
>
> Noting the assumptions (virtualenv in use and the version of python)
> might be appropriate of course.
>

IMO let's just keep it that way . As long as it will be well
understood that it's not an issue of BH and there is a link to find
the information in the right place ... ;)

What d'u think ?

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Reply via email to