No objection to that. Two questions: 1) Was it the error report that got the user to think it is a Trac problem? Do we need to amend this? 2) Should we encourage people using bloodhound to raise all issues to us (incl likely Trac ones)?
I would say yes to the second one because so far we've always kept tickets like that open as a reference and raised one upstream. For users that makes our site a single point of contact, and we know what it is upstream that affects them. Cheers, Joe ________________________ @jdreimann - Twitter Sent from my phone On 11 Apr 2013, at 09:30, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: > There was a Bloodhound ticket reported to Trac yesterday [1]. I was > thinking to ask the Trac devs to CC [email protected] on Bloodhound > issues that are incorrectly reported to trac.edgewall.org. That way, we > will see the issue even if the reporter never follows up by reporting the > issue to Bloodhound. Does anyone foresee a problem with this? > > [1] http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11147
